INQUIRY

Send Your Suggestions and Feed backs to dil_scoop@live.com
Showing posts with label ICC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ICC. Show all posts

Apr 8, 2014

A letter to Indian cricket fan from Sri Lankan cricket fan

Dear Indian fan:

It had hurt us three years back when we saw those videos from Marine Drive and Connaught Place and Park Street from three years back. We, however, did not vow revenge or anything like that (if the team had, they had not let us know). If you had seen our players tonight, they were never arrogant in their celebrations.

The team did not have time to plot revenge: there was a time in 2011 when they did not get paid for eight months(yes, they had come runners-up in the World Cup despite that). They were offered proper contracts only in July 2012. The next year Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) had removed the stipulated players’ share from the International Cricket Council (ICC) events (25%), and it was only after Sanath Jayasuriya had stepped in that the players had agreed. They were not given the profit: they were only promised they would be given the same.

Can you imagine your men playing under such circumstances? No, I guess.

It did not end there. Jayasuriya did keep his word; when the players demanded 20% of the profit, he had put their proposal forward to SLC. When SLC had announced the fresh set of contracts, the ICC events share was not a part of it.

Take a moment to realise this. Put your men in their shoes. The men have been representing their country in the most high-profile event (and have been turning them into successes; they may not have been winning, but they have not exactly failed either), only to be told by SLC that they would not get a part of the profit from that tournament.

This reminded me of international cricket in the pre-Kerry Packer days when players were often told that if they did not want to play for the side there were plenty who would. Your own CK Nayudu, your first Test captain, had done the same to Vinoo Mankad, you may remember.

Anyway, four days before the tournament, SLC raised the topic to the Executive Committee. The players were announced incentives, but there were no ICC events shares announced for them. When the players insisted on the shares, SLC issued a threat that they would send a second-string side to the tournament. This happened on the day the players left for Bangladesh. Our heroes had left for the tournament without contracts.

You see why we don’t stone their houses the way you did Yuvraj Singh’s today? The reason is simple: they have been stabbed by their own board; we are the only ones backing them. With no assured contract, almost no Indian Premier League (IPL) contract against their names, with our own version of the IPL getting cancelled, the pride and fans are all they have while taking on the best of the world in a country away from home.

That is precisely why we never back out when it comes to supporting them: they have lost one final after the other, but we have never lost hope. Can you believe what you would have done to your men if they had lost four world tournament finals in five years? We had not gone after our players’ blood: instead, we had joked that it was our President’s turning up at the venue midway that had tilted the match West Indies’ way in the 2012 World T20 final.

Do you know something? We have grown up in conditions you have seen in newsreels and have read in newspapers, but have never really (I really hope you do not) had real-life brushes. We have grown up in a country where many of us were not sure of our safe return when we left home in the morning.

“Pressure is a Messerschmitt up your arse,” Keith Miller had said once. He had seen death from close quarters. So had we. Which is why defeats do not mean the end of the world for us. In those dark days of internal turmoil,Arjuna Ranatunga and Aravinda de Silva had kept Sri Lankan cricket alive. The 1996 World Cup had a role more significant in our history than you can imagine.

We fell from that zenith, and rose again; and fell again; in Muttiah Muralitharan we found our greatest cricket hero, in Jayasuriya a murderous marauder, in Lasith Malinga a rebellious freak; and then, in the two men who have quit this version of the sport today, the two icons we were left with.

They have given us a lot, and have got hardly anything back in return. The best we could do for them was to turn up in huge numbers and turn the band on, day in and day out. If they won, we were happy; if they did not, we had to accept it. It was like that in the 1980s. It has been like that in the 2010s as well. Three decades ago we used to lose in the league stages; now we lose the finals.

The fact remained that we had not won anything of note barring the 1996 World Cup. Eighteen years have elapsed since that. This win was long due. They have never given up hope in between: they tried, failed, tried, failed, tried, failed, tried, till they succeeded.

It has been our story all along.

It has been the story of the average Sri Lankan.

It has been the story of the Sri Lankan cricketer.

We may not have the best support, but we dream; and we do not give up when our dreams meet a dead end. We have a team where every man is a Robert the Bruce with no spider to show them the way.

We have not forgotten you, though. You [and Pakistan] had visited us before the 1996 World Cup when Australia and West Indies had refused to. We still owe you that.

Sri Lanka is a beautiful [and of late, rather peaceful] place. Come over for a trip some day. We will discuss all kinds of ICC event finals and have a laugh at how we manage to show up in them every now and then. Till then,

A Sri Lankan fan


Author : Abhishek Mukherjee  on Cricketcountry.com

Jun 4, 2011

Kumar Sangakkara on this week's ICC Cricket World Radio Show

On this week's ICC Cricket World Radio Show, Sri Lanka's Kumar Sangakkara talks exclusively ahead of the start of tomorrow's second Test match between Sri Lanka and England and also discusses his partnership with the International Cricket Council's Think Wise campaign while Dr. Peter Harcourt, the chair of the ICC Medical Committee, explains to listeners the role and importance of the committee.

Sangakkara, who has played in 95 Test matches to date for Sri Lanka says about the Cardiff loss and looking ahead to Lord's tomorrow: "Disappointing is an understatement about Cardiff in regards to our batting. We were horrendous. We know it and have accepted that. No one tries to have a performance like that. We have to take responsibility for that, I think Cardiff was a tough lesson for us and an important one for us as a team.

"We have a different bowling attack than England, we don't have the same height. It is a bit of guile, swing, seam and we bowl to our plans. We have a lot of ability and a lot of variation. How best to use that is something we will try to answer in the next five days."

The 33-year-old also talks about his work with ICC Think Wise partnership and why cricketers should be involved in the initiative to remove the stigma associated with HIV and AIDS.

"Its very important because cricketers are held in high esteem, highly visible public figures. With majority of AIDS affected people living in cricket playing countries, our roles become that much more important. Also the fact that we support people with HIV and AIDS, so that they can lead a fruitful life so that they can access good life. More and more cricketers should be associated with it. Not just one or two cricketers but having teams take on this responsibility, that is going to be the best way forward that will strengthen the role played by ICC," says Sangakkara. 

Read More at ICC-CRICKET.YAHOO.NET

May 11, 2011

Results of ICC Cricket Committee meeting

The ICC Cricket Committee concluded its two-day meeting at Lord's in London on Wednesday.

Chaired by Clive Lloyd, the former West Indies captain and twice an ICC Cricket World Cup winner, it includes ex-Australia captain Mark Taylor, former India coach Gary Kirsten, former India captain Ravi Shastri, ex-West Indies fast bowler Ian Bishop and Clare Connor, the former captain of the England women's team.

The committee's role is to make recommendations on cricket matters which then go forward to the Chief Executives' Committee (CEC) for approval before finally being presented to the ICC Executive Board for approval.

As such, any recommendations made by the ICC Cricket Committee will not take effect until ratified and/or approved by the CEC and the Board, both of which are scheduled to meet in Hong Kong from 26 to 30 June.

The following were among the issues covered by the ICC Cricket Committee:


Decision Review System (DRS)

The ICC Cricket Committee reviewed in detail the use of the DRS since its last meeting and, while recognising the need to take account of existing contractual arrangements between Member Boards and their broadcasters, the committee unanimously recommended that DRS should be used in all Test matches.

It also recommended that it should be used in ODI and T20I series with each side allowed one unsuccessful review per innings. This recommendation was made following what the committee agreed was a successful application during the ICC Cricket World Cup 2011.

The DRS has been used in Test cricket since 2009 and over the past two years has featured in 31 Tests with each side allowed two unsuccessful reviews per innings.

ICC Cricket Committee Chairman Clive Lloyd said: "The committee's recommendation that the DRS should be used in all formats of the game confirms two key conclusions that came from our discussions: it shows the group's confidence in the system and it also highlights the committee's view that it does aid the umpires in making correct decisions.



Day-night Test cricket

On the basis of evidence presented to it, the committee has concluded that the pink ball is likely to be the most effective ball for potential use in day-night Test cricket.

However, the committee believes the ball, which was trialed by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) in Abu Dhabi in 2011, required further testing in first-class cricket to confirm its durability before it could recommend its adoption as a Test match ball as part of a move towards day-night Tests in the future.

On that basis, the committee has recommended that the pink ball should be used in the four-day first-class ICC Intercontinental Cup 2011-12 (the tournament involving the leading Associate and Affiliate teams) and also that ICC Member Boards be asked not only to use the ball in at least one round of first-class matches but also be encouraged to trial the ball in day-night matches at venues which have adequate artificial lights.

The committee will consider the matter further once these trials have taken place.

ICC General Manager - Cricket David Richardson said: "The ICC remains determined to explore the possibility of day-night Test cricket but at the same time we have to ensure the integrity of that format is also protected.

"The further trials proposed by the ICC Cricket Committee are a reflection of the fact we want to make sure that the pink ball is sufficiently durable to stand up to the rigours of first-class cricket.

"The ICC will conduct its own trials using the ICC Intercontinental Cup and, provided the move is approved by the Chief Executives' Committee and the Executive Board, we will then be able to secure the necessary information to allow us to make an informed decision on whether or not we can take this innovation to the next level, using a pink ball for day-night Tests in the future."



One-Day International (ODI) cricket

The committee was delighted to acknowledge the successful staging of the recent ICC Cricket World Cup and made the following recommendations to further enhance the ODI format:

* Two balls should be used in each innings, one from each end; (currently only one ball is being used and replaced by a replacement ball after 34 overs); and

* teams should only be allowed to take the batting and bowling power play between overs 16 - 40;

The committee also suggested that trials of the following playing conditions be conducted in domestic cricket before being considered for international cricket:

* Removal of the restriction on the maximum number of overs each bowler could deliver;

* no compulsory close-catchers;

* a maximum of four fielders outside the 30-yard fielding circle during non-powerplay overs; and

* the number of bouncers that can be delivered per over to be increased from one to two.

The recommendations are aimed at enhancing the format and creating an identity for ODIs distinct from the Test and T20I format by improving the balance between bat and ball. The committee also believes this would make the middle overs more exciting.

ICC Chief Executive Haroon Lorgat said: "Notwithstanding the strong success of 50-over cricket at the recent ICC Cricket World Cup, I am delighted that the ICC Cricket Committee has been creative in seeking to enhance the format to ensure its continued future."

Over-rates in international cricket

The committee has recommended that a captain of an international side should be suspended for one match if his side is guilty of two minor over-rate offences in the same format over a 12-month period.

This recommendation would be a tightening of the current ICC Code of Conduct regulations which state that such a punishment is applicable only after three such offences.



The above recommendations are a reflection of the committee's ongoing concern at the current level of over-rates in international cricket.

Laws and playing conditions

The committee recommended that

* runners not be allowed in international cricket;
* the practice of a batsman intentionally changing his direction whilst running between the wickets with a view to blocking a run-out chance was contrary to the Laws (37.1) and that the batsman would be given out on appeal from the fielding side;
* the MCC amend law 42.15 to allow the bowler to run out the non-striker before releasing the ball provided he has not completed his usual delivery swing.

The next ICC Cricket Committee meeting will take place in November 2011 with the exact date and location to be announced in due course.

Media arrangements

SNTV will file a story. Further details should be available to SNTV subscribers through usual contacts.

Getty Images, the ICC's official photographer, has already filed photographs of the meeting, the first day of which was on Tuesday 10 May, and will also be releasing images from the media conference held after the meeting on Wednesday 11 May. Further details can be obtained from Andy Smith at andy.smith@gettyimages.com or Richard Pitts at Richard.pitts@gettyimages.com.

The ICC Cricket Committee comprises:

Clive Lloyd (Chairman)

Haroon Lorgat (ICC Chief Executive - ex-officio)

Ian Bishop and Mark Taylor (past players, both attended the first day of the meeting)

Tim May (representative of current players)

Gary Kirsten (Full Member team coach representative)

Clare Connor (women's representative)

Justin Vaughan (member board representative)

Trent Johnston (associate representative)

Ravi Shastri (media representative)

Steve Davis (umpires' representative)

Ranjan Madugalle (referees' representative)

Keith Bradshaw (MCC representative)

David Kendix (statistician)

Apologies:

Sharad Pawar (ICC President - ex-officio)

Kumar Sangakkara (representative of current players)



Source : ICC Media Release - Wed, May 11, 2011 9:08 PM


Jan 11, 2011

WORLD CUP 2011 - Umpires !

WORLD CUP 2011  - 18 UMPIRES
Australia
 Simon Taufel  
 Steve Davis
 Rod Tucker
 Daryl Harper
 Bruce Oxenford

New Zealand
 Billy Bowden
 Tony Hill

South Africa
 Marais Erasmus

Pakistan
 Aleem Dar
 Asad Rauf

India
 Shavir Tarapore
 Amish Saheba

England
 Ian Gould
 Richard Kettleborough
 Nigel Llong

Sri Lanka
 Asoka de Silva
 Kumar Dharmasena

West Indies
 Billy Doctrove

Popular Posts